Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00148
Original file (PD2013 00148.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                  CASE: PD1300148
BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY           BOARD DATE: 20140227
SEPARATION DATE: 20040714


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Specialist/E-4 (21B10/Combat Engineer) medically separated for cholinergic urticarial (hives). The CI was first seen for a complaint of hives in January 2004. It was determined he would be non-deployable and the condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded cholinergic urticaria, severe, to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the cholinergic urticaria condition as unfitting, rated 0%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Rash, hives, and the fact that the Army retired me without a rating and other medical issues that I have since then. I had asthma since 2003 and I was taking medications for it and also Rhinitis too, and I didn’t get a rating for those either.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting cholinergic urticaria is addressed below. The requested asthma and rhinitis conditions were not identified by the MEB/PEB, and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview. No additional conditions are within the Board’s purview.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB 20040405
 VA Exam (2 Weeks after Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Cholinergic Urticaria 7825 0% Cholinergic Urticaria 7825 10% 20040727
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 7 20040727
Rating: 0%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 41122 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s assertions that his disability disposition was in some way unfair. It is noted for the record that the Board has no jurisdiction to investigate or render opinions in reference to such assertions. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records or redress by the United States judiciary system.

Cholinergic Urticaria. The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the onset of intermittent whole body hives with heat exposure in January 2004. The CI reported that he developed large red itching wheals once a week approximately several hours in duration. He stated that his hives were worsened by heat, physical training and hot showers. His hives and itching were relieved by cold showers and the use of anti-histamine medications. All laboratory results were normal and a diagnosis of cholinergic urticaria was rendered. The NARSUM examination was normal. At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed at separation, the CI reported a history of shortness of breath, dizziness, burning sensation to his skin, wheezing and urticaria with exposure to heat dating back to 2003. He reported the use of Allegra two times a day for his urticarial and allergic rhinitis. His skin examination was normal.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the cholinergic urticarial condition as unfitting with a 0% disability rating coded 7825. The VA rated the cholinergic urticarial condition at 10% for recurrent episodes occurring at least 4 times during the past 12-month period and responding to treatment with anti-histamines. The Board noted that the PEB described the cholinergic urticarial condition as recurrent and treated with antihistamines. There was no evidence of systemic immunosuppressive therapy. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the cholinergic urticarial condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the cholinergic urticarial condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 7825 IAW VASRD §4.118. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Cholinergic Urticaria 7825 10%
RATING 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20121123, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
invalid font number 31502 SFMR-RB                                                                         

invalid font number 31502
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 invalid font number 31502 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
invalid font number 31502 for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX invalid font number 31502 , AR20140009361 (PD201300148)

 invalid font number 31502
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:


 invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX invalid font number 31502
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00150

    Original file (PD 2013 00150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were limited MH treatment notes in the records before the Board, but the available records support that the two sets of symptoms waxed and waned together.The CI developed a non-MH condition treated with steroid medications that reportedly caused weight gain and/or inhibited mandatory weight loss to meet Navy physical standards.The Board noted that during the time that the CI wastreated with steroids, she had an exacerbation of depression symptoms leading to an inpatient hospitalization...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00544

    Original file (PD 2012 00544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Corrections of Military Records. The PEB and the VA both rated the condition 10%, but under separate codes. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00884

    Original file (PD2012-00884.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI underwent a Limited Duty (LIMDU) Board in October 2001 approximately 15 months prior to separation in which the examiner noted that the CI was still complaining of hives being continuous and daily with some urticaria noted on her arms and a requirement of antihistamine medications. The Board reviewed the criteria for 7825 and considered the CI’s history of chronic urticaria and the need for daily medications to control this condition. After due deliberation in consideration of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02232

    Original file (PD-2013-02232.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB characterized the CI’s skin condition as “solar urticaria” (a condition in which exposure to the sun [or ultraviolet radiation] induces urticaria or hives)and forwarded this to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) for consideration. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00108

    Original file (PD2010-00108.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based upon the lack of episodes during the last twelve months of service, the Board considered the appropriate rating to be 0% at the time of separation. The Board therefore has no basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01795

    Original file (PD-2013-01795.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI reported flares of the skin with sun exposure only. The diagnosis was atopic (allergic rhinitis) and the examiner opined that increased temperature (rather than sunlight or ultraviolet radiation caused the rash.At a VA dermatology evaluation on 30 September 2004,a month after separation, the CI was using vitamin E lotion only, having “tried and failed”multiple treatments including oral steroids, steroid creams, antihistamines, animmunosuppressant skin cream (Elidel), and “light box...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01539

    Original file (PD2013 01539.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI non-concurred and the Reconsideration PEB only adjudicated the “posttraumatic arthritis, right ankle…” as unfitting, rated 10%, identifying all other conditions as not unfitting. Right Ankle Condition . Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01569

    Original file (PD-2013-01569.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Service FPEB – Dated 20041103VA – 88 Months Post-SeparationConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Radiating LBP 52420%Chronic LBP5237NSC20120529Left Toe...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01713

    Original file (PD2013 01713.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP) status post (s/p) L5/S1 fusion” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Should the Board judge that a condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements, a disability rating IAW the VASRD, based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation, will be recommended. invalid font number 31502 ” The CI had chronic LBP and ROM flexion limited to 80 degrees at the MEB exam.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01649

    Original file (PD2012 01649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.For a rating recommendation IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board must apply the 2002 VASRD coding and rating standards for the spine. BOARD FINDINGS : The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the chronic mid and upper back pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the...